oh only 4 more? that shouldnt be too bad
TheKunadiun wrote…
oh only 4 more? that shouldnt be too bad
He was using number substitution for "for", not "four". Seing the names of the people who have voted, we are still waiting for more than four more..
PuppetXeno wrote…
TheKunadiun wrote…
oh only 4 more? that shouldnt be too bad
He was using number substitution for "for", not "four". Seing the names of the people who have voted, we are still waiting for more than four more..
Oh he was? oh i didnt notice that...heres what he said:
"Yes..Were still waiting for 4 more....Don't wanna say names you know , so no pressure but hurry though..lol"
he has two 4's in there...the "for" and the 4
i see, you're right! But.. The math.. Just doesn't add up, or did i miscalculate?
Marino wrote…
Ok there's 6 to go...
phew.. I almost got a little concerned there.. lol
hooray another voter
Sorry, you do not have access to post...
Wanna post? Join Today!